PDA

View Full Version : Opportunity knocks ... 12 times


WebSavvy
02-07-2007, 02:48/02:48AM
We're adding some new features to WebSavvy, and as such, we have an opportunity to offer to one site in each of the following categories:[list=1]
Law (Lawyer)
Travel Agent
Real Estate Agent
Shopping
Restaurant
Medical
Education
Hotel
Motel
Web Hosting
Web Design
Photography
[/list=1]The opportunity available is a free review to be listed in WebSavvy, providing the site meets our guidelines published on our Add URL (http://www.websavvy.cc/) page.

However, this is with one small caveat, the site must be web accessible -- at least level A, and the HTML/CSS must be valid.

Further, the site would also be used in our "example" for the new features we're adding, which means the site would be able to also have the added features free of charge.

If you have a site that is in one of the aforementioned categories and meets all other criteria outlined, please send me a PM with the details.

As the spots are filled, I'll update this thread as to what's still available.

Thanks!

ihelpyou
02-07-2007, 07:33/07:33AM
Deb; I'm thinking many reading this do not know what the criteria are for web accessibility in the first place. Heck, I sure do not. :D You should post links as well that explains things completely as you don't want a bunch of sites PM'ing you that are not close. Also; only "members" in here can PM you. What about all people who simply lurk and read and are not members?

WebSavvy
02-07-2007, 07:41/07:41AM
People that lurke can always join, it's open to membership here. :)

OK, I'll post some links to information that explains web accessibility (level A), in just a little bit.

SEFL
02-07-2007, 22:56/10:56PM
How about http://www.456bereastreet.com for the Web Design category?

WebSavvy
03-07-2007, 03:24/03:24AM
I'll take a look at it. We've already had one submitted for that category, but I haven't checked it yet to make sure the code is valid and it passes level A.

We've had a few more for other categories too, and I need to check those first, and then will update the thread.

Thanks for the suggestion, Adam.