PDA

View Full Version : Are you happy with your PPC rates


surfmale
23-11-2007, 16:08/04:08PM
Hi All,

[We don't allow self-promotion in here. If your purpose is to solicit business I suggest you find a forum that allows that. - moderator]

mooper
02-08-2008, 18:31/06:31PM
Looks like someone had spammed in here, but made me realize a relevant point to his title...

Higher prices for PPC are *not*inherently a bad thing. In fact, as someone who has spent millions on them, higher PPC prices generally represent a good thing because the pricing mechanism is self-adjusting for quality... when adverisers are paying more, they are getting more out of each visitor... a good thing. If I could wave a wand and instantly cut prices in half (back to where they were 3-4 years ago), I'd pass.

IncrediBILL
03-08-2008, 03:06/03:06AM
Higher prices for PPC are *not*inherently a bad thing.

Compared to free SE traffic, paying for any traffic is a bad thing.

mooper
03-08-2008, 07:49/07:49AM
Compared to free SE traffic, paying for any traffic is a bad thing.

If you can get the same quantity and quality from free SE traffic as you can from PPC and they are mutually exclusive substitutes - then absolutely!

In my experience, paying for traffic usually yields better conversions (quality) and always yields additional quantity (albeit with some undesirable cannibalization), especially when sourced from partners not providing free SE results.

It would be nice to receive hundreds of thousands of highly targeted daily clicks via free SE, but the volume simply isnt there when relying on it exclusively.

IncrediBILL
03-08-2008, 19:28/07:28PM
It would be nice to receive hundreds of thousands of highly targeted daily clicks via free SE, but the volume simply isnt there when relying on it exclusively.

If you knew SEO it wouldn't be a problem as I get 20K highly targeted visitors on a slow day and it's all 100% free courtesy Google, Yahoo and MSN. I then sell advertising on my site at prices below PPC rates for people that crave that traffic.

It's a win-win for everyone except those that pay top tier PPC rates for the same traffic ;)

mooper
03-08-2008, 19:49/07:49PM
If you knew SEO it wouldn't be a problem as I get 20K highly targeted visitors on a slow day and it's all 100% free courtesy Google, Yahoo and MSN. I then sell advertising on my site at prices below PPC rates for people that crave that traffic.

It's a win-win for everyone except those that pay top tier PPC rates for the same traffic ;)

By highly targeted, I meant for keywords that convert at significant rates for specific products and services. If you can get 20K completely free visitors that convert at 35 RPC (revenue per click) - the average for our traffic - then you are indeed a very rich man (20K * .35 = $7,000 pure profit daily, or $2MIL+ per year!). I suspect you are full of it if that is your claim... more likely, if you actually see 20K free visitors per day, you aren't able to convert them (via the traffic sales you mentioned) for any more than a few pennies RPC. (And, if the traffic is actually high-converting and targeted but you are selling it for little, then you are making a huge mistake.)

Also, note that I originally said hundreds of thousands per day, not 20K per day. If you can get hundreds of thousands of highly targeted and high-converting traffic free each day, then I would like a fleet of Lamborghinis please!

IncrediBILL
04-08-2008, 16:40/04:40PM
Mooper, you're making invalid assumptions about my business model and obviously overlooked the fact that I said I sell advertising and not products.

I have to have highly targeted traffic for my advertisers otherwise I wouldn't have any advertisers, understand now?

mooper
04-08-2008, 18:29/06:29PM
Mooper, you're making invalid assumptions about my business model and obviously overlooked the fact that I said I sell advertising and not products.

I have to have highly targeted traffic for my advertisers otherwise I wouldn't have any advertisers, understand now?

I did not make any assumptions at all - I asked you some questions.

To be absolutely clear, I will ask again and not assume a thing:

How much revenue are you able to get out of the 20K free visitors you get daily?

We are able to get roughly 200K daily visitors and convert them to roughly 35 cents revenue per click via PPC. Of course we have a very substantial cost to pay for that traffic, but margins are still there. If you can enlighten me to the ability of natural SEO to drive 20K daily visitors at no cost that convert at even one-half of the revenue per click we produce, maybe I should expand my business. Of course I'm not asking you to share any business secrets - after all, you wouldn't become a multi-millionaire by telling everyone else how to get the same 20K daily free visitors you do - but I'd love to hear a confirmation that itis possible.

IncrediBILL
04-08-2008, 21:18/09:18PM
How much revenue are you able to get out of the 20K free visitors you get daily?

I won't share what I make exactly because some people know my site and I sure as heck don't need any more competition.

However, I will share that the paid advertising ranges between 7%-10% CTR so my advertisers are well taken care of and some have been with me over 5 years.

My advertisers have included some major corporations in the past like HP, APPLE, etc. and we're not talking affiliate programs, we're talking direct ad campaigns, so you know I'm not making chump change.

Besides, 20K visitors is kind of the low end summer slump as it was cranking 1M visitors a month not too long ago.

mooper
05-08-2008, 01:05/01:05AM
I won't share what I make exactly...However, I will share that the paid advertising ranges between 7%-10% CTR so my advertisers are well taken care of and some have been with me over 5 years...it was cranking 1M visitors a month not too long ago.

30K+ visitors per day, cost-free, is what you claim to have. If you convert these visitors by *any* means (selling a product or service to small or large clients who are happy or not happy with low or high CTRs, etc.) into 10 cents of revenue per click, then you are making $3,000 pure profit daily - or $1 MIL+ per year. Given that even poor and untargeted traffic can be converted around 5 cents RPC and half-decent traffic above 10, either A) you are a multi-millionaire (if so, good for you... I haven't heard of anyone becoming rich from "natural SEO" since the substantial value of the practice died in the 90s, except for some foreign porn spammers who continued to milk it into this decade), or B) you are misrepresenting your situation by claiming more free visitors than you actually receive, exaggerating the quality of your traffic, or both.

Regardless of the above realities, PPC provides the opportunity to get *additional* traffic far beyond the levels you claim to see, in a predictable and measurable and controllable fashion. 200K visitors at a 10% profit margin is just as good as 20K visitors at a 100% profit margin (or better, if more stable), so I see no reason to shun it. Properly orchestrated, there is no need for cannibalization.

IncrediBILL
05-08-2008, 03:36/03:36AM
Mooper, not all visitors convert and I've been involved with many ecommerce sites, some made upwards of $240K/month, and none of them converted with the twisted statistics you keep quoting.

mooper
05-08-2008, 09:53/09:53AM
Mooper, not all visitors convert and I've been involved with many ecommerce sites, some made upwards of $240K/month, and none of them converted with the twisted statistics you keep quoting.

Of course not all visitors convert... anyone in the business knows that it is a game of averages. Absolutely nothing is twisted about my statistics. If you feel otherwise, please cite the details and I will attempt to clarify.

I ask again: What is the average revenue per visitor you see from your 20K-30K daily free visitors? No need to provide any detail on how you convert them to revenue, what their demographics are, or anything else. All I'm looking for - because perhaps you could enlighten me to a business model I thought was dead and have bypassed - is how much profit *you* are able to make from those visitors (which, in your case with no substantial cost of aquiring the traffic, is virtually equivilent to you revenue figure).

WebSavvy
05-08-2008, 17:16/05:16PM
I ask again: What is the average revenue per visitor you see from your 20K-30K daily free visitors?
Didn't he already answer this for you when he said this:

I won't share what I make exactly because some people know my site and I sure as heck don't need any more competition.

Pretty much cleared it up as far as I can tell. BTW, I happen to know which site Bill's talking about ... and he's not exaggerating.

BTW, Bill. Sending you a PM -- I spoke to the Lycos guy and it's a go. Sending you details.

mooper
05-08-2008, 17:44/05:44PM
Didn't he already answer this for you when he said this:



Pretty much cleared it up as far as I can tell. BTW, I happen to know which site Bill's talking about ... and he's not exaggerating.

BTW, Bill. Sending you a PM -- I spoke to the Lycos guy and it's a go. Sending you details.

I respect an honest privacy concern, but I happen to know that 20K to 30K free completely visitors from natural SEO only *that convert to revenue at a comparable rate to PPC visitors* is not reality. I am asking him tongue-in-cheek. If he sees that quantity of visitors, then he makes pennies from each, at best, on average. If he makes a substantial RPC, then he doesn't see nearly 20K to 30K free visitors per day. If I am wrong on both counts, then he is a multi-millionaire and I am unaware of the potential that natural SEO holds for making people multi-millionaires post-1999.

Also, he did nothing to clarify why even *if* his fantasy world where natural SEO is an extremely lucrative business exists, why buying trafific in quantities that far exceed natual SEO levels (assuming it is not cannibalizing and that its cost is lower than the revenue it produces) would not be a wildly desirable complement.

WebSavvy
05-08-2008, 17:53/05:53PM
If I am wrong on both counts, then he is a multi-millionaire and I am unaware of the potential that natural SEO holds for making people multi-millionaires post-1999.
I'd go with that one. :D

chongzivalve08089
29-09-2008, 08:57/08:57AM
spam removed

marston10
24-11-2008, 07:03/07:03AM
I think PPC costs are quite expensive, it is good in a way coz you only pay when someone clicks on you but the price of each click is really high, I think SEO is much better and more cost effective

[Removed Multiple URLs]

Connie
24-11-2008, 10:07/10:07AM
I removed your link. Read the forum guidelines (http://www.ihelpyou.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=18677).