aaaaa
26-02-2003, 18:50/06:50PM
:cheers:
Conducting a Search on Google or Msn for "reciprocal link exchange" or "link farms" or "free for all links pages" "ffa" - etc.
... will return webpages with fairly decent PageRanks that have been existing over a period of time on various search services.
Some people use this a standard of whether - or - not
these techniques have validity.
(Why would they thrive on the Search Engines if they were "spam" or "outlawed")
Additionally, search engines "spider" links...
does this linking technique actually increase the frequency of a listed webpage being spidered - thus, decreasing the odds of updates not being reflected.
Is it possible that WebSites have been "dropped" due to programming idiosyncracies of the various search engines
(for examples Google has various "cached" versions with various updates that appear during the month - perhaps not ALL the databases have ALL the pages or SAME pages listed)
Conducting a Search on Google or Msn for "reciprocal link exchange" or "link farms" or "free for all links pages" "ffa" - etc.
... will return webpages with fairly decent PageRanks that have been existing over a period of time on various search services.
Some people use this a standard of whether - or - not
these techniques have validity.
(Why would they thrive on the Search Engines if they were "spam" or "outlawed")
Additionally, search engines "spider" links...
does this linking technique actually increase the frequency of a listed webpage being spidered - thus, decreasing the odds of updates not being reflected.
Is it possible that WebSites have been "dropped" due to programming idiosyncracies of the various search engines
(for examples Google has various "cached" versions with various updates that appear during the month - perhaps not ALL the databases have ALL the pages or SAME pages listed)